Cookies

Like most websites The Translational Scientist uses cookies. In order to deliver a personalized, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. Learn more.
Disease Area Cancer

Single Test Boosts Childhood Cancer Care

Mutation analysis in oncology is a fast-growing field – but some mutations are trickier than others. Gene fusions present a challenge due to the rarity of individual fusions, the potential for atypical breakpoints, and promiscuous fusion partners. Nonetheless, it’s believed that gene fusions play a role in up to 20 percent of all human cancers (1). In fact, several childhood cancers, including leukemias, lymphomas, and sarcomas, are distinguished by their potential for gene fusions. Accurate detection of these mutations is vital for effective patient care – and that’s why a research team in the Netherlands has employed a method of RNA sequencing using the whole transcriptome in a bid to improve diagnostic accuracy.

The results stem from the Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, which has increased its identification of relevant tumor characteristics by almost 40 percent since adopting whole transcriptome RNA sequencing for all of their patients (2). Using the new approach, the researchers were able to identify 83 fusions within 244 patients, 24 of which were missed by traditional methods and seven of which modified the original diagnosis or treatment. And, although standard diagnostics identified many of the same fusion genes, the identification was often just one half of the two-sided fusion, yielding an incomplete picture.

“RNA sequencing was already used before, but only in children who were very ill, and for whom standard treatment had stopped working,” said study co-author Bastiaan Tops (3). “In our research hospital setting at the Princess Máxima Center, we have implemented RNA sequencing into standard diagnostics. Our new study shows that this approach is paying off.”

Whole transcriptome RNA sequencing is not without its disadvantages – most significantly, that the ideal sample size is 300 ng of RNA (with a minimum of at least 50 ng), whereas traditional methods such as RT-PCR require as little as 10 ng. Nonetheless, the study authors encountered insufficient sample volume or quality in only 3 percent of cases, making this a minor issue relative to the clinical benefits offered by whole transcriptome RNA sequencing.

Receive content, products, events as well as relevant industry updates from The Translational Scientist and its sponsors.

When you click “Subscribe” we will email you a link, which you must click to verify the email address above and activate your subscription. If you do not receive this email, please contact us at [email protected].
If you wish to unsubscribe, you can update your preferences at any point.

  1. F Mitelman et al., Nat Rev Cancer, 7, 233 (2007). PMID: 17361217.
  2. JY Hehir-Kwa et al., JCO Precision Oncology, 6, e2000504 (2022). PMID: 35085008.
  3. Princess Máxima Center (2022). Available at: https://bit.ly/3ttZcHo.
About the Author
George Lee

Associate Editor, The Pathologist

Like most people, I didn’t know exactly what I wanted to do after university. But one thing was certain – writing would play a central role. Not one to walk the path most traveled, I decided to spend my next few years freelancing to hone my skills as a writer and further cement my love for language. Reaching people through writing is important to me and I look forward to connecting with thousands of people through Texere’s passionate audience.

Register to The Translational Scientist

Register to access our FREE online portfolio, request the magazine in print and manage your preferences.

You will benefit from:

  • Unlimited access to ALL articles
  • News, interviews & opinions from leading industry experts

Register